Additional Broward DUI Lawyer William Moore Case Results
BROWARD DUI CASENO06004815TCA04 – BROWARD DUI LAWYER MOORE HAS CASE DISMISSED.
Defendant was found passed out behind the wheel of his automobile which was parked slanted and occupying two parking spaces in his residential development. Prior to the police being called on the scene, State witnesses allege that they had seen the Firm’s client operating the vehicle, and that he had passed out with the door open and an alcoholic beverage by his side. Upon making contact with the Defendant, officers observed him to be incoherent, having slurred speech, bloodshot eyes, and in need of medical treatment. Paramedics were called to the scene.
RESULT
Upon fully investigating the claim and presenting witnesses, the defense established inconsistent evidence that challenged the State’s eyewitness testimony as to the events that occurred on the night of Defendant’s arrest. Confronted with contradictory testimony that Defendant had not been operating the vehicle on the night of his arrest, the Assistant State Attorney agreed to breakdown the Broward DUI charge to reckless driving, and the Firm’s client was not convicted of Broward DUI.
BROWARD CRIMINAL CASENO060048196CF10A – BROWARD DUI LAWYER MOORE GETS A DISMISSAL.
Co-Defendant charged in Felony Court maintained his innocence to the charges filed by the State Attorney’s Office, and demanded a speedy trial when it became apparent that State witnesses would be unavailable to testify against him after over one year of litigation. Unable to proceed, the State dismissed all counts against the Firm’s client when the Court refused to allow more time for the State to prepare.
RESULT
Dismissal of all felony counts.
BROWARD DUI CASENO0601743423MM10A – BROWARD DUI LAWYER MOORE OBTAINS “NOT GUILTY VERDICT.”
Client was stopped driving 55 in a 35 mph speed zone; officer observed the following signs of impairment – flushed face, bloodshot eyes, slurred speech, and a strong odor of alcohol. During roadside sobriety exercises, client failed to touch heel to toe, used arms for balance and swayed off of the line several times. On finger to nose test, client touched mouth and missed nose on two occasions. On one-leg stand, client used arms for balance and only raised foot two inches off the ground. Client refused to provide a breath sample when requested to do so.
At the Broward DUI trial Defendant testified that she had consumed an alcoholic beverage, however, was not impaired at the time of the stop. Client also admitted to lying to law enforcement officers at the time of arrest, stating that she had not been drinking. Client stated in court that she did not take the Intoxilyzer as she believed that police officers were trying to mount a case against her and she did not trust breath testing machines based on what she had been told and articles that she had read in the past.
RESULT
After a short deliberation, jurors returned with a not guilty verdict on all counts.
BROWARD DUI CASENO0625795MM10A – BROWARD LAWYER GETS VERDICT OF STATES EVIDENCE.
Client was observed failing to maintain a single lane, weaving across marked roadway lanes. Broward DUI video of the Firm’s client on the night of his arrest showed clear evidence of intoxication in the form of slurred speech, inability to answer questions or perform roadside sobriety exercises. Due to the client residing out of state, a request was made to have this matter special set for trial before a jury, as opposed to being placed on standby.
RESULT
On the day of trial the State Attorney’s Office amended the charge from Broward DUI to reckless driving based on the belief they could not succeed in obtaining a conviction with the evidence available to them. Client was not convicted of DUI.
MIAMI DUI CASENO6155XAE – BROWARD DUI LAWYER HAS MIAMI CASE DISMISSED,
Client was in an alleged accident wherein she made an improper turn in front of an oncoming vehicle causing impact. Subsequently client was charged with one count of DUI/property damage. Upon conducting an accident investigation, law enforcement officers called DUI task force to the scene after observing the Defendant with a flushed face, red eyes, slurred speech and otherwise being unsteady on her feet.
Roadside sobriety exercises were administered whereby the Defendant gave several signs of impairment. The client refused to participate in any chemical testing and would not provide a breath sample to determine the alcohol content of her blood.
In preparing client’s defense it was determined that certain trees planted by the city in the median of the intersection where the accident took place prevented the client from adequately seeing oncoming traffic. Exhibits were prepared of the intersection for use at trial to establish that the accident was not the fault of the client.
RESULT
On the day of trial the State Attorney’s Office dismissed all charges against our client, believing that they would be unable to obtain a conviction in this matter. The Firm’s client was not convicted of DUI.
MIAMI DUI CASENO0961XAV – BROWARD DUI LAWYER HAS DUI CHARGE REDUCED TO RECKLESS DRIVING.
The Firm’s client was arrested for DUI after being found passed out behind the wheel of an automobile at an intersection. Upon making contact with the Firm’s client, law enforcement described her as having a flushed face, red eyes, and slurred speech with a strong odor of alcohol. Roadside sobriety exercises were administered whereby the Firm’s client was unsteady on her feet, swayed, used her arms for balance and was unable to complete and/or understand the tasks given to her by DUI taskforce.
On the day of trial the state attorney offered a breakdown from DUI to reckless driving due to the fact they believed they would not succeed in obtaining a conviction against the Firm’s client.
RESULT
The Firm’s client was not convicted of DUI.
MIAMI DUI CASENO489798X – BROWARD DUI LAWYER GETS DUI CHARGES DOWN TO RECKLESS DRIVING.
The Firm’s client was involved in an altercation while leaving a nightclub in Miami Beach, FL. Law enforcement officers claimed that he appeared to have been drinking and stopped him after he left the premises operating his motor vehicle. Upon making contact with the Firm’s client, law enforcement indicated that he had slurred speech, red eyes, a flushed face and was unsteady on his feet. The Firm’s client was unable to complete roadside sobriety exercises, nor was he able to follow the law enforcement officer’s instructions. The Firm’s client refused any chemical testing.
On the day of trial the State Attorney’s Office, believing they would be unable to obtain a conviction for DUI, offered a break down of the charges to reckless driving.
RESULT
The Firm’s client accepted the break down and was not convicted of DUI.
BROWARD DUI CASENO06025087MM10A – BROWARD DUI LAWYER GETS CLIENT TREATMENT IN LIEU OF JAIL.
The Firm’s client was facing Broward DUI charges and a mandatory jail sentence.
RESULT
The Firm’s client was permitted to receive treatment for his alcohol abuse as opposed to serving a mandatory jail sentence.
BROWARD CRIMINAL CASENO06002688MM10A – BROWARD DUI LAWYER HAS CHARGES DISMISSED.
On the day of trial, the state attorney dismissed all charges pending against the Firm’s client believing that they would be unable to obtain a conviction before a jury.
RESULT
No further action was taken against the Firm’s client.
BROWARD DUI CASENO06022666CF10A – BROWARD DUI LAWYER HAS FELONY COUNTS DISMISSED.
The Firm’s client was charged with Broward DUI and battery upon a law enforcement officer when said arresting officer alleged that the Firm’s client had attempted to kick him while being arrested and lunged at his groin area.
RESULT
After a thorough investigation of all facts in the case the State Attorney’s Office agreed to dismiss the felony count against the Firm’s client, believing they would not succeed on a conviction if the case proceeded to trial.
BROWARD CRIMINAL CASENO06004396CF10A – BROWARD DUI LAWYER HAS ALL COUNTS DISMISSED.
Upon exceeding the allotted time whereby the state must bring a Defendant to trial, this Firm filed an appropriate notice of expiration of speedy trial forcing the state to proceed to jury trial within ten days of the notice. Being unprepared and unable to procure witnesses in time, the assistant state attorney had no choice but to dismiss all charges against the Firm’s client.
RESULT
No additional action was ever taken.
Defendant was found passed out behind the wheel of his automobile which was parked slanted and occupying two parking spaces in his residential development. Prior to the police being called on the scene, State witnesses allege that they had seen the Firm’s client operating the vehicle, and that he had passed out with the door open and an alcoholic beverage by his side. Upon making contact with the Defendant, officers observed him to be incoherent, having slurred speech, bloodshot eyes, and in need of medical treatment. Paramedics were called to the scene.
RESULT
Upon fully investigating the claim and presenting witnesses, the defense established inconsistent evidence that challenged the State’s eyewitness testimony as to the events that occurred on the night of Defendant’s arrest. Confronted with contradictory testimony that Defendant had not been operating the vehicle on the night of his arrest, the Assistant State Attorney agreed to breakdown the Broward DUI charge to reckless driving, and the Firm’s client was not convicted of Broward DUI.
BROWARD CRIMINAL CASENO060048196CF10A – BROWARD DUI LAWYER MOORE GETS A DISMISSAL.
Co-Defendant charged in Felony Court maintained his innocence to the charges filed by the State Attorney’s Office, and demanded a speedy trial when it became apparent that State witnesses would be unavailable to testify against him after over one year of litigation. Unable to proceed, the State dismissed all counts against the Firm’s client when the Court refused to allow more time for the State to prepare.
RESULT
Dismissal of all felony counts.
BROWARD DUI CASENO0601743423MM10A – BROWARD DUI LAWYER MOORE OBTAINS “NOT GUILTY VERDICT.”
Client was stopped driving 55 in a 35 mph speed zone; officer observed the following signs of impairment – flushed face, bloodshot eyes, slurred speech, and a strong odor of alcohol. During roadside sobriety exercises, client failed to touch heel to toe, used arms for balance and swayed off of the line several times. On finger to nose test, client touched mouth and missed nose on two occasions. On one-leg stand, client used arms for balance and only raised foot two inches off the ground. Client refused to provide a breath sample when requested to do so.
At the Broward DUI trial Defendant testified that she had consumed an alcoholic beverage, however, was not impaired at the time of the stop. Client also admitted to lying to law enforcement officers at the time of arrest, stating that she had not been drinking. Client stated in court that she did not take the Intoxilyzer as she believed that police officers were trying to mount a case against her and she did not trust breath testing machines based on what she had been told and articles that she had read in the past.
RESULT
After a short deliberation, jurors returned with a not guilty verdict on all counts.
BROWARD DUI CASENO0625795MM10A – BROWARD LAWYER GETS VERDICT OF STATES EVIDENCE.
Client was observed failing to maintain a single lane, weaving across marked roadway lanes. Broward DUI video of the Firm’s client on the night of his arrest showed clear evidence of intoxication in the form of slurred speech, inability to answer questions or perform roadside sobriety exercises. Due to the client residing out of state, a request was made to have this matter special set for trial before a jury, as opposed to being placed on standby.
RESULT
On the day of trial the State Attorney’s Office amended the charge from Broward DUI to reckless driving based on the belief they could not succeed in obtaining a conviction with the evidence available to them. Client was not convicted of DUI.
MIAMI DUI CASENO6155XAE – BROWARD DUI LAWYER HAS MIAMI CASE DISMISSED,
Client was in an alleged accident wherein she made an improper turn in front of an oncoming vehicle causing impact. Subsequently client was charged with one count of DUI/property damage. Upon conducting an accident investigation, law enforcement officers called DUI task force to the scene after observing the Defendant with a flushed face, red eyes, slurred speech and otherwise being unsteady on her feet.
Roadside sobriety exercises were administered whereby the Defendant gave several signs of impairment. The client refused to participate in any chemical testing and would not provide a breath sample to determine the alcohol content of her blood.
In preparing client’s defense it was determined that certain trees planted by the city in the median of the intersection where the accident took place prevented the client from adequately seeing oncoming traffic. Exhibits were prepared of the intersection for use at trial to establish that the accident was not the fault of the client.
RESULT
On the day of trial the State Attorney’s Office dismissed all charges against our client, believing that they would be unable to obtain a conviction in this matter. The Firm’s client was not convicted of DUI.
MIAMI DUI CASENO0961XAV – BROWARD DUI LAWYER HAS DUI CHARGE REDUCED TO RECKLESS DRIVING.
The Firm’s client was arrested for DUI after being found passed out behind the wheel of an automobile at an intersection. Upon making contact with the Firm’s client, law enforcement described her as having a flushed face, red eyes, and slurred speech with a strong odor of alcohol. Roadside sobriety exercises were administered whereby the Firm’s client was unsteady on her feet, swayed, used her arms for balance and was unable to complete and/or understand the tasks given to her by DUI taskforce.
On the day of trial the state attorney offered a breakdown from DUI to reckless driving due to the fact they believed they would not succeed in obtaining a conviction against the Firm’s client.
RESULT
The Firm’s client was not convicted of DUI.
MIAMI DUI CASENO489798X – BROWARD DUI LAWYER GETS DUI CHARGES DOWN TO RECKLESS DRIVING.
The Firm’s client was involved in an altercation while leaving a nightclub in Miami Beach, FL. Law enforcement officers claimed that he appeared to have been drinking and stopped him after he left the premises operating his motor vehicle. Upon making contact with the Firm’s client, law enforcement indicated that he had slurred speech, red eyes, a flushed face and was unsteady on his feet. The Firm’s client was unable to complete roadside sobriety exercises, nor was he able to follow the law enforcement officer’s instructions. The Firm’s client refused any chemical testing.
On the day of trial the State Attorney’s Office, believing they would be unable to obtain a conviction for DUI, offered a break down of the charges to reckless driving.
RESULT
The Firm’s client accepted the break down and was not convicted of DUI.
BROWARD DUI CASENO06025087MM10A – BROWARD DUI LAWYER GETS CLIENT TREATMENT IN LIEU OF JAIL.
The Firm’s client was facing Broward DUI charges and a mandatory jail sentence.
RESULT
The Firm’s client was permitted to receive treatment for his alcohol abuse as opposed to serving a mandatory jail sentence.
BROWARD CRIMINAL CASENO06002688MM10A – BROWARD DUI LAWYER HAS CHARGES DISMISSED.
On the day of trial, the state attorney dismissed all charges pending against the Firm’s client believing that they would be unable to obtain a conviction before a jury.
RESULT
No further action was taken against the Firm’s client.
BROWARD DUI CASENO06022666CF10A – BROWARD DUI LAWYER HAS FELONY COUNTS DISMISSED.
The Firm’s client was charged with Broward DUI and battery upon a law enforcement officer when said arresting officer alleged that the Firm’s client had attempted to kick him while being arrested and lunged at his groin area.
RESULT
After a thorough investigation of all facts in the case the State Attorney’s Office agreed to dismiss the felony count against the Firm’s client, believing they would not succeed on a conviction if the case proceeded to trial.
BROWARD CRIMINAL CASENO06004396CF10A – BROWARD DUI LAWYER HAS ALL COUNTS DISMISSED.
Upon exceeding the allotted time whereby the state must bring a Defendant to trial, this Firm filed an appropriate notice of expiration of speedy trial forcing the state to proceed to jury trial within ten days of the notice. Being unprepared and unable to procure witnesses in time, the assistant state attorney had no choice but to dismiss all charges against the Firm’s client.
RESULT
No additional action was ever taken.