BROWARD DUI ATTORNEY, William Ryan Moore “Case Results”
Here is a partial list of cases defended by Broward DUI Attorney William Moore. Please call our office for additional information about these cases. Actual names of the people mentioned have been omitted for privacy reasons.
BROWARD DUI CASENO07024740MM10A – BROWARD DUI ATTORNEY GETS CHARGES REDUCED.
Client was a former police officer charged with a Broward DUI. Client took the Intoxilyzer which gave a reading above .08 and charges were subsequently filed. Defendant demanded a trial on the merits, but the State, believing they would be unable to secure a conviction agreed to break down the Broward DUI to a reckless driving charge.
After demanding a trial on the merits in this Miami DUI, feeling that they would be unable to secure a conviction, the State Attorney’s office agreed to break-down the DUI charge to reckless driving.
Client was involved in a car accident without injuries. Police noticed signs of impairment by way of flushed face, bloodshot eyes, slurred speech, and odor of alcohol emanating from defendant’s breath. After announcing ready for trial, Broward DUI Attorney William Moore proffered to the court and state attorney that there was some issue as to whether or not the State could prove the client was actually the one in physical control of the vehicle at the time of impact.
RESULT
The Assistant State Attorney consequently agreed to break down the Miami DUI to a reckless driving charge.
Client charged with driving under the influence.
RESULT
Miami DUI charges were reduced to reckless driving.
BROWARD CRIMINAL CASENO08006878TC10A – BROWARD DUI ATTORNEY WINS A “NOT GUILTY” IN CRIMINAL CASE.
The firm’s client was charged with driving while license suspended resulting from a previous DUI suspension or refusing to submit to an intoxilyzer. DUI charges were pending when an officer stopped the defendant’s vehicle for a traffic infraction and found that he had sustained a suspension. The state attorney’s office had offered a plea of 30 days in the
RESULT
A trial on the merits of the case was demanded upon Broward DUI attorney William Moore’s realization that the charging document filed by the state was, in fact, faulty. Upon the resting of the state’s case, these issues were brought to the attention to the judge who promptly rendered a ruling in favor of our client.
BROWARD CRIMINAL CASENO08002267MM40A – BROWARD DUI ATTORNEY GETS NOT GUILTY AGAIN.
Our client was charged with a misdemeanor. This client was a police officer who was forced to resign after the allegations were brought by local law enforcement and the state attorneys’ office. An issue that made this case so threatening to our client was the fact that a conviction would result in a denial of his pension. Furthermore, any certification to obtain employment as a law enforcement officer would be revoked.
RESULT
Taking an aggressive stance in this matter, Broward DUI attorney William Moore pushed forward with his defense for trial. Catching the state attorney off guard and unprepared with very little to no evidence, the state attorney’s office had no choice but to go forward. A not guilty verdict was obtained.
BROWARD DUI CASENO07002126MM10A – BROWARD DUI ATTORNEY GETS BREAKDOWN TO RECKLESS DRIVING.
Client was pulled over for traveling 95 MPH in a posted 45 MPH zone. Upon making contact an officer from the Florida Highway Patrol noticed an open container (rum and coke) in the cup holder of client’s automobile. When asked to perform roadside exercises, signs of impairment were detected by the officer during the following exercises: HGN, walk & turn test, one leg stand and finger to nose. Client was brought to the
RESULT
The client suffered from a condition that caused him to stutter. This may have otherwise led the law enforcement officer to believe he was impaired by alcohol due to speech challenges. The admissibility of his refusal to submit to chemical testing was also challenged via a Motion to Suppress which was to be heard on the day of trial. Broward DUI attorney, William Moore, believing that the State would be unable to secure a conviction in this matter pressed forward and a breakdown to reckless driving was offered and accepted by our client.
BROWARD CRIMINAL CASENO07010411MM10A – BROWARD DUI ATTORNEY GETS CASE DISMISSED.
BROWARD DUI CASENO07006630MM10A – BROWARD DUI ATTORNEY GETS THE PROSECUTION TO DECLINE THE CASE.
After a thorough review of the case, the State Attorney declined prosecution on the Broward DUI.
BROWARD CRIMINAL CASE NO07005850CF10A –
After reviewing evidence available to them, and believing that they would be unable to obtain a conviction, the State Attorney’s office declined pursuing charges against the Firm’s client.
BROWARD DUI CASENO07026977CF10A – BROWARD DUI ATTORNEY GOT CASE DECLINED.
The State Attorney’s office declined to pursue charges against the Firm’s client upon a review of all evidence and investigative reports believing that a conviction could not be obtained.
BROWARD DUI CASENO07008085MM10A – BROWARD DUI ATTORNEY HAS CERTAIN CHARGES DROPPED.
Client was driving his vehicle westbound on
RESULT
After communication with the State Attorney’s office, the assigned State prosecutor declined prosecuting the firm’s client for fleeing the scene and running from police officers. The Broward DUI is still pending.
BROWARD CRIMINAL CASENO07012299CF10A –
The Firm’s client charged with a 3rd degree felony following being pulled over for careless driving while traveling southbound on Interstate 95. Upon searching suspect’s automobile after obtaining consent, a firearm was found in the glove compartment of the vehicle. Client was arrested for carrying a concealed firearm and careless driving.
Under
RESULT
Upon contacting the State Attorney’s Office and making a legal argument prior to filing, the assigned Assistant State Attorney declined prosecution in both the careless driving and carrying a concealed firearm charges and released the firearm to the Defendant. Additionally, the State Attorney’s office agreed to refrain from seeking criminal charges under the careless driving statute.
BROWARD CRIMINAL CASENO07014931MM10A – BROWARD DUI ATTORNEY HAS CASE DISMISSED.
Client rejected all offers made by the State and demanded a jury trial on the merits of the case. Upon realizing that the State Attorney was unlikely to obtain a conviction in the matter, all charges were dropped.
BROWARD CRIMINAL CASENO07005560CF10A – BROWARD DUI ATTORNEY GETS CHARGES DROPPED.
Our client was arrested for possession of oxycontin, oxycodone, xanax, crack cocaine, Broward DUI, possession of drug paraphernalia and carrying a concealed weapon.
RESULT
Following an investigation of the case by our law firm, the State voluntarily dismissed all charges with the exception of the possession of drug paraphernalia.
BROWARD DUI CASENO07021674MM10A – BROWARD DUI ATTORNEY GETS CHARGES DISMISSED.
Our client was charged with a Broward DUI.
RESULT
After thoroughly investigating the case and preparing all necessary defenses, the State Attorney’s office voluntarily dismissed the Broward DUI charge against our client.
BROWARD DUI CASENO07001714MM10A – BROWARD DUI ATTORNEY GETS NOT GUILT VERDICT.
Client retained our law firm after being charged with driving under the influence. The state’s case was very strong in that defendant was pulled over at 4:00 in the morning traveling at a high rate of speed on A1A away from the direction of his home. Allegations also included that the defendant could not maintain a single lane and swerved across two lanes of traffic. Upon being pulled over, our client threw his keys in an effort to hide them and consistently said on Broward DUI investigation video that he had not been operating the vehicle. When pushed further by the responding Broward DUI investigator, defendant admitted he had been driving, he was the only person on the scene, and it was his automobile that had been stopped by a previous officer. Defendant slurred as he spoke and swayed from side to side. Despite the list of damaging facts against our client, he proceeded to trial due to the fact that a conviction for Broward DUI would cause him to lose his job and give up his career selling pharmaceutical supplies nationwide.
STRATEGY – in any case involving such horrible facts against the defense, it is imperative that a jury be selected that may be able to sympathize with the defendant and refrain from rendering a guilty verdict. These juries often apply the true letter of the law holding the state attorney’s office to their extremely high burden of proving the case beyond and to the exclusion of any and all reasonable doubt.
RESULT